Part Four- America: A Place for One Another and Othering
Part Four- America: A Place for One Another and Othering
20th Century – The Era of Reform
A review of the articles
presented in this series reveals certain pervasive convictions in America. We
learned that during the era of exploration, Europeans applied the doctrine of discovery
to rationalize the subjugation of indigenous people. We discovered the colonial
rationales behind mercantilism, the economic imperatives that entitled the procurement
of another culture’s resources. The notion of ordained authority justified both
of these exploitations by asserting that God gave permission for them. We see
these belief system surface again as we close out our discussion of 20th
century America and our relationship to othering.
Still a fledgling nation in the 1800’s,
America was ill equipped to handle the consequences of rapid industrialization,
yet the circumstances in our country at the close of the 19th
century, seemed almost predictable. Philosophically, we accepted the enormous income
gap between the industrialists and the working class, the rampant neglect and
abuse of marginalized communities and the violation of basic human rights.
A major hurdle to any
progress initiated by 20th century reformists, was challenging the
notion that extreme inequality was acceptable. Social Darwinism arose during
the late 1700’s and remained popular with key figures like Andrew Carnegie during
his rise to power in the 1800’s. The
concept, despite being a pseudo-science, provided a permission structure to
disregard the needs of the working class by proclaiming elites were chosen to
be at the top of the societal pyramid and workers were chosen to be at the
bottom. It dovetailed with earlier ethos of ordained authority and
mercantilism and further codified the practice of othering. As a result, much
of the reform that took place in the 1900’s tried to undo attitudes and practices
that negatively impacted the working class.
As the Gilded Age peaked,
so did American tolerance for powerful industrialists amassing great fortunes
at all costs. The stark contrast between the haves and the have nots could no
longer be ignored. Systemic discrimination, in the form of legal maneuvering,
prevented the working class from advancing. Blacks, women and immigrants were
often the targets of laws that prevented land ownership, equal pay, and unionization.
Children had no rights and no voice to protest. The effects of privation could
be seen in infant mortality rates, workplace injuries and decreased life
expectancy. The term “urban mortality penalty” referred to more poor people
dying in cities at the turn of the century than were being born. America had
reached a tipping point. In response, activists emerged from diverse strata
across society to address the egregious circumstances confronting these groups.
Transformations began in earnest to address the social ills befalling those
outside the top tier. Historians would call this the Era of Reform or
Progressive Era. Later in the century it would become known as the Civil Rights
Era.
Voting rights, racial and gender equality issues garnered much attention during the 20th century as well. Susan B Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Staton fought for women’s suffrage for over fifty years before the 19th amendment was finally passed in 1920. During the age of segregation, approximately 1900- 1939, the NCAA was founded to combat the effect of Jim Crow laws enacted after the Civil War. Major Civil Rights Era legislation was later passed in 1964, by President Johnson, which addressed discriminatory practices based on race, sex, ethnicity and religion. Interestingly though, despite all fifty states recognizing a woman’s right to own property and open bank accounts by 1900, laws remained in effect preventing women from uniformly being issued credit until 1974.
As we close this series,
hopefully an appreciation of the historical origins of national identity, our thought
patterns and belief systems, has been gained. There is a cyclic nature to these
philosophies and viewpoints. It can be explained as such: implementation leads to impact, impact to revocation,
revocation to revival. Regarding the viewpoint of inequality and practice of
subjugation, whether we refer to it as othering or not, we can trace implementation
and impact to the heart of many great national tragedies and human suffering. Conversely,
when we enter the phase of the cycle where we reject and revoke policies that are
divisive or destructive, we can follow the historical path to great advances
for humanity. By identifying what part of the cycle we’re currently
experiencing, we gain the ability to change course.
It is my sincere hope
that we use history as a tool to create a national identity that promotes the
wellbeing of all Americans.


Comments
Post a Comment