
A surprising experience it has
been doing some light research looking for women’s roles and their perspective
on the Erie Canal. While there can be no
doubt of involvement by women, most of it seems to be boiled down to small
marginal mentions as cooks or boat maids that seemingly - and more often than not - fall into the
category of women’s duties on a family boat.
It should be mentioned, that there are points in which the perspective
of women – particularly in the early era of the canal – is mindfully eye
opening regarding the physical landscape as well as that of the people.

Men are mentioned foremost, as
the idealists, the dreamers, the politicians, the financiers, the labor, the
hands, heart and soul of the canal. They
too had their vision of that artificial river, but readers of works on the Erie
Canal have them portrayed as the adventurers, muscle and thinkers of the era. Now, this is not intended to “bash” the
classic interpretation of the canal, and by no means can we shake all the truth
out of women’s roles for everyone to see but a tiny rattle should be enough to
send us all out seeking more!

Women more often viewed the canal
as opportunity – not for commerce, though they too would benefit from that –
but as one for community. Settling the
newly founded towns and cities provided new opportunities to create
neighborhoods, communities and social networks.
Women who migrated or immigrated with their canal laboring husbands or
fathers saw it as their responsibility to establish these within the waning
“wilderness” that was once the reaches along the state.

While it is extremely true –
albeit generic – to say that women
on the canal were often cooks, maids
or cabin girls, that is not examining the true impact those terms convey. Family barges saw wives as not only spouse
and mother but yes, as cooks, maids, laundress, steers(wo)man, and probably a
lot more than just that once you image a family traveling along at 4
mph on a cramped barge. Think of family dynamics, especially with
kids! On top of raising the children on
board a vessel for much of the year, they were responsible for so much of the
daily operations – at least in the first several decades…what we may want to
deem as the “Golden Era” of the canal before company barges were
predominate.

Even after that era, women were
employed on barges – often the wife of the captain making nearly a dollar a day
for her domestic services. A few instances saw woman captaining their own vessels
(see article to the right). Although it is
also at this stage that an increasing number of references were toward women
along
the canal and as the landscape changed so did the temperament of the
people. With success of the canal other
more troubling aspects arose, mostly viewed today as social issues. Let’s not ignore the role some more…bawdy
perhaps, women played along the way.
Every Lock seemed ripe with stores, taverns, hotels, boardinghouses, and
all the trappings that one can image comes along with large numbers of
transient people – especially workers.
But women where workers of the
canal too and not just in those above mentioned ways either. As families often operated canal stores, and
family men were lock-tenders, those duties too were shared across gender lines. As the canal operated 24 hours a day, seven
days a week during navigation, woman stepped into these roles as a matter of
supporting the family. This can be
expanded further, to the farmers, lumbermen, boat builders, cobblers, and other
suppliers, woman had a hand in keeping the system…er hm.. “a-float.” Additionally, this was beyond just the
regional pull of the canal, with increasing textile production and the rising
population demands on women increased as well.
Keep in mind; this is occurring
over the course of decades but the State – and the Nation – were changing in
dramatic ways. The Canal offered an
information superhighway for its day, as religious, ideological, political,
technological and social knowledge as well as trends flowed as easily along its
banks as the water did. In these decades
the rise in social awareness occurs, as the increase in the wealth of some and
the lack of it by others draws steely glances from the national
conscience. Population increases and
shifts has brought attention to not only the diversity of the people, but of
their views, opinions and sway at the ballot box (that is if they were allowed
anywhere near one). Those bawdy houses,
alcohol consumption and the reputation – often well deserved – of the canal as
a place for vagrants, thugs and thieves was an ugly dark smudge on the shiny
Empire State. Temperance movements and
social reform organizations developed and fought for changes. Those in and of themselves can and do have volumes
written about them, but for this
purpose their galvanization of people, resources and political clout –
especially combined with the Abolitionist movement – educated those seeking
even more rights.
Women being a large component of
these organizational forces developed strategies’ for their own freedom as they
aided others seeking theirs. Perhaps it
should be no wonder that those most credited with fighting for Women’s Rights
and Suffrage did so in New York. The
climate had changed in America, and the Erie Canal precipitated much of it.
What may be the true testament of
the overall role of women on the Erie Canal, that as much as they domesticated
the wilderness – whether that was aboard boats or on the land – they were
a major part of what was happening: Socially, economically, religiously and actively!
Comments
Post a Comment